~penarik beca

Bangga, bangga! Selepas ini tanah di Lojing tak ada siapa kacau, perlantikan Yang Dipertua MPKB tak ada siapa kacau. Kuah tidak lagi tumpah ke nasi. Bangga, bangga!

Kelantan bangga dengan perlantikan Timbalan Agong

Harakahdaily (13/12/11): Naib Presiden PAS, Datuk Husam Musa melahirkan rasa bangga beliau dan rakyat Kelantan atas perlantikan Tuanku Sultan Kelantan, Sultan Muhammad Ke V, sebagai Timbalan Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

Dalam satu kenyataannya, Husam yang juga Exco kerajaan negeri berkata, "Perkenan para kekanda ke Bawah DYMM Raja-Raja Melayu memilih Tuanku Sultan Kelantan selaku Timbalan Yang di-Pertuan Agong besar ertinya terhadap kedaulatan dan kebesaran Tuanku.

"Besar pula maknanya bagi seluruh rakyat Negeri Kelantan Darul Naim," kata Husam dalam satu kenyataan medianya.

Husam juga melahirkan keyakinannya, Tuanku Faris Petra mampu memberi makna kepada kesaksamaan kemajuan wilayah dan mengharumkan nama negeri ini dengan hemah, prihatin, bijaksana, berjiwa rakyat, mempunyai visi yang dinamik dan berdedikasi yang ada pada baginda.

"Selama ini, dalam tempoh yang singkat, Tuanku menjadi kebanggan rakyat Kelantan dan rasa bangga itu akan Insya Allah akan dikongsi pula oleh seluruh rakyat Malaysia," tegas Husam dalam kenyataannya.

Sementara itu, Dewan Pemuda PAS Kelantan juga merakamkan ‘sembah tahniah’ di atas pengisytiharan Sultan Muhammad ke V memegang jawatan Timbalan Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

Ketuanya, Abdul Latif Abdul Rahman, berkata pihaknya berbesar hati di atas perlantikkan itu.

“Semoga perlantikan tuanku membawa berkah dan keamanan di negeri Kelantan Tadahan Wahyu ini.

“Patik mewakili Dewan Pemuda PAS Negeri Kelantan, merakamkan sembah tahniah kepada tuanku semoga tuanku di lindungi dunia dan akhirat,”ujarnya.

Syukur atas perlantikan Agong

Husam juga mempersembahkan ucapan tahniah dan rasa syukur di atas perlantikan DYMM Al Sultan Kedah, Tuanku Abdul Halim Mu'adzam Shah dan DYMM Al Sultan Kelantan, Sultan Muhammad V, yang masing-masing selaku DYMM Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan DYMM Timbalan Yang di-Pertuan Agong yang ke 14.

Selaku rakyat yang menjunjung tinggi kelangsungan Kesultanan Melayu selaku teras utama politik negara menerusi konsep Raja Berperlembagaan dan Demokrasi Berparlimen sejak turun temurun, saya merasa bangga dan bertuah menyaksikan perlantikan Tuanku berdua, kata Husam.

"Selaku DYMM Yang di-Pertuan Agong bagi kali yang kedua bagi Ke Bawah DYMM Al Sultan Kedah, sudah tentu memberikan nostalgia zaman anak-anak saya dengan ketinggian budi, hemah, bijaksana dan mesra rakyat ke Bawah Duli Tuanku sewaktu berada di atas singgahsana sebagai DYMM Yang di-Pertuan Agong bagi kali pertama dahulu.

"Insya Allah, dengan pengalaman luas dan berpandangan jauh lagi saksama yang dianugerahkan Allah kepada Tuanku, Malaysia akan terus bersatu maju, adil, makmur, maju dan aman damai," kata Husam.

Husam juga mengucapkan junjung kasih kepada DYMM Yang di-Pertuan Agung ke 13, Tuanku Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin atas khidmat baginda yang cemerlang.

"Semoga Allah melanjutkan usia baginda dalam keadaan sihat dan 'afiat serta diberikan hidayah dan taufik yang berterusan," katanya dalam kenyataan itu.

Berikut antara yang saya jumpai ialah dalam tulisan bertajuk "Islam Today" yang bersumberkan kuliah-kuliah Maulana Abul A'la Maududi:

Kingship no doubt brought a host of evils in its wake, but even during that period, the Muslims did much better than other nations in corresponding portions of their history. Indeed the Muslims produced a larger number of good, God fearing kings than did any other community. But, while one must give these virtuous kings all the praise that is due to them, there is little doubt that, on the whole, the natural and necessary consequences of the system of kingship were detrimental to the interests of Islam and the Muslims.

To the limited extent that Islam did spread during the centuries of Muslim rule in India it was due to the efforts of the theologians and the sufis. The rulers not only made no contribution towards the spread of Islam, their behavior and conduct generally tended to thwart the expansion of the creed. By their .tyrannical rule and oppressive policies, by their bullying and high handedness, by the their dissolute living and otherwise immoral conduct, most of the kings and lesser potentates tended to alienate people from Islam rather than make the Faith popular; only a few of them could boast of character and conduct that would induce non-Muslims to join the ranks of Islam. These few exceptions no doubt deserve all praise, but it is obvious that, on the whole, kingship caused grave harm to the cause of Islam.

Another malady that had its origin during the period of kingship, and continued to spread thereafter was the erosion of the Muslim's loyalty to Islam and the Millat and its ultimate replacement by loyalty to the self and the clan or family. Islam had originally abolished all loyalties based upon race, language or nationality, and replaced them with a single, absolute loyalty to God, His Prophet and the Faith. It was on the basis of this supreme loyalty that Islam sought to build the character of the individual. But during the period of kingship this loyalty soon began to weaken, and since it was the foundation of public morality and private character, its weakening naturally resulted in the growth of selfishness and self-promotion. In the absence of ideals and higher loyalties, people are not willing to make any sacrifices and everyone is interested merely in feathering his own nest or promoting the interests of his family or clan. This was what happened in Muslim society during the era of kingship.

Dan juga dari buku bertajuk "Restatement of History of Islam":

When engaged in the practical task of drawing up a new constitution for Pakistan that ‘would be in consonance with the teachings and history of Islam,' (President) Ayub Khan asked his experts to study Islamic history and the constitutions of other Muslim countries. Two things emerged clearly from this study: There was no place for Kingship in Islam, and succession could not be on a hereditary basis. The community as a whole must have the right to choose its leader and the right to remove him. (This means that all Muslim monarchies, whatever their pretensions to religiosity, have been totally unIslamic). On these two fundamentals there is indeed agreement among our political reformers, but on every other aspect of Islamic policy there are differences of substance and of emphasis. (Militant Islam, New York)

The Ikhwan al-Muslimeen (the Muslim Brotherhood) of Egypt, has indicted all military regimes (dictatorships) also as unIslamic.

The Muslim Brotherhood stressed that no government established by force can be accepted, for consultation is mandatory according to Sura 42 verse 35 of the Koran. Hence military regimes produced by coups are unIslamic. (Militant Islam, New York)

It is, therefore, the consensus of the Sunni scholars of Pakistan and the Sunni spokesmen of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, that monarchy and military regimes both are unIslamic.

Dari muka surat 37 buku bertajuk "Islam in South-East Asia"